Following the Tracks of the First South Americans
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
Published: 5 May 2011
In this article, a summary of the geologic, paleontological, and human history of an area of the Atlantic coast in the Pampean plain, Argentina is discussed. This area presents very interesting characteristics. On the one hand, the area includes the Monte Hermoso cliffs studied by Charles Darwin in 1832, which compose the set of localities related to the development of the theory of evolution. On the other hand, in the referred area, an extraordinary amount of human and Pleistocene mammal footprints are registered. Also in that section, four diachronic stages have been registered which depict the evolutionary scenario during the last five million years. Four paleontological and archeological sites are described, showing the palaeoenvironmental changes that occurred there regarding fauna associations and human settlement. The first scenario is found at Monte Hermoso cliff, whose sediments contain fossil remains of the autochthonous South American fauna. The second scenario shows a remarkable change in the drainage system where the fauna is composed of immigrated taxa due to the Great American Biotic Interchange. Both last scenarios show human presence; the third one shows faint evidences (one human trackway and two isolated footprints), and in the last one the hunter–gatherers are fully represented as a well-established population on the Pampean coast during the Early Holocene, registered at La Olla and Monte Hermoso I sites. In this way, the sites summarized in this work allow the reconstruction of four remarkable evolutionary scenarios in South America, as regards landscapes, fauna associations, and human population.
KeywordsFossil mammal footprints Pleistocene megamammal extinctions Early peopling of South America Holocene coastal adaptations
The high number of either human or animal footprints is the most remarkable aspect of this group of archeological and paleontological sites. In spite of the extensive span of time considered and the geographic, climatic, and biologically important changes that occurred, the same formation conditions and erosive processes were amazingly repeated to allow the preservation and exposition of footprints of different origin and age.
A footprint or ichnite is a trace left on a soft substratum by an organism moving on it. However, in order to be preserved as a fossil footprint or ichnofossil, certain special conditions must be present. The substratum should be wet for the footprint to be imprinted; afterwards, it has to dry and be covered with sediment of different composition within a brief period of time. After thousands or millions of years, this substratum turns into a rather consolidated rock. The thinner the sediment grains, the better the footprint details are preserved. Also, the differences in lithology allow the formation of a weakness plane through which the rocks can be separated by the means of erosion, permitting the ichnite to be exposed and studied.
In the sector of the Atlantic coast summarized here, the presence of ichnites is complemented with another type of information; namely, synchronic and diachronic, which allows a more precise reconstruction of the environmental and human history. These elements are outcrops exposed along many kilometers with Tertiary and Quaternary sediments, containing vertebrate fossils and stone, bone, and wooden tools of human populations who occupied the region since the Late Pleistocene.
With the Monte Hermoso fossil cavy, Darwin had direct evidence of the existence of an extinct species that had been replaced by a close relative still alive today. There can be no way of concluding with certainty that Darwin had by then become a ‘transmutationist’ but it is clear from his notes that he was actively contemplating the possibility as early as late 1832. Thus, I cannot help but think of Bahia Blanca as being as important to the development of Darwin’s thinking as his much more famous visit to the Galapagos Islands three years later!
Lo que aumenta extraordinariamente la importancia del yacimiento de Monte Hermoso, es la presencia del hombre conjuntamente con una fauna singular, revelada tanto por algunos pedernales y huesos toscamente tallados cuanto por la existencia de fogones en distintos niveles de la barranca, engastados en capas de arcilla, de los que con trabajo he podido arrancar fragmentos para llevar al Museo de La Provincia en La Plata [The importance of the Monte Hermoso deposit is the presence of man, together with such a singular fauna, both revealed in flints and bones grossly carved, the existence of campfires at different cliff levels and mounted in clay layers from which I was able to take fragments to take to the Museo de La Provincia en La Plata] (Ameghino 1887: 5/6).
Between 1906 and 1907, he made public the Tetraprothomo argentinus, which he considered to be an ancestor of humans. The remains found were a femur and an atlas; the first one was collected by Carlos Ameghino, while the atlas belonged to the Museo de La Plata collection (Pupio et al. 2009). Finally, in 1910, he published the finding of the oldest industry he recognized “la Industria de la Piedra Quebrada” (the broken stone industry), which he assigned to the Upper Miocene. During the Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, held in Buenos Aires in 1910, the Monte Hermoso cliff was visited by Aleš Hrdlička and Bailey Willis, who rejected Ameghino’s propositions. The debate was fierce, and the site was repeatedly visited to clarify different aspects, such as stratigraphy and technology. The current knowledge about this geological, paleontological, and archeological site is presented in this article.
The Scenarios and Evidence
The First Scenario: Farola Monte Hermoso
These sediments contain vertebrate remains, particularly of Miocene–Pliocene mammals, members of the native fauna that lived in South America before the Great American Biotic Interchange. Among them, the marsupials were represented by some groups including Borhyaenids, which make their last appearance in the stratigraphic record. Other important representatives were the Xenarthra, both armadillos (Dasypodidae: i.e., Macroeuphractus and Chorobates; and Glyptodontidae: i.e., Plohophorus and Nopachthus) and ground sloths (Mylodontidae: i.e., Proscelidodon and Lestodon). Among the native ungulates, the remains of the Order Notoungulata are frequent, those of the Hegetotheridae, Mesotheriidae, and Toxodontidae families. Members of the two families of the Litopterna order, Protherotheriidae and Macraucheniidae (Promacrauchenia), are also found. There is also a varied representation of rodents corresponding to the second faunistic stratum of South America (Old Island Hoppers, Simpson 1950). Among them, species of Caviidae, Octodontidae, and Hydrochoeridae families are found. Freshwater fish, amphibious, reptile, and bird rests are present as well.
The mammal association of this site is extremely significative, and it is characteristic of a specific evolutionary stage called Montehermosan Stage/Age (Marshall et al. 1983). Actually, this site is the archetype of this biostratigraphic unit. Although most of the fossils preserved here are bones, which have helped define the Stage/Age, there are also medium-sized footprints, which belong to ground sloths, characteristic members of the South American native fauna (Aramayo and de Manera Bianco 1996).
After a long period during which there was no sedimentary record, the Monte Hermoso Formation was topped with aeolian sandstones at the beginning of the Upper Pleistocene. These sediments compose the Puerto Belgrano Formation, formed in a dune and interdune environment (Zavala 1993). On top of this sandstone level, breccias and fluvial conglomerates were deposited, forming the Lower and Medium Members of the Punta Tejada Formation. These deposits are connected to the configuration of the fluvial valley related to the present Sauce Grande River. At that moment, the direction of the regional drainage changed, establishing it from Ventania to the Atlantic. The old Sauce Grande River flowed near the east end of the modern FMH cliff (Bayón and Zavala 1997).
The Upper Member of Punta Tejada Formation was assigned by Zavala (1993) as Lower/Middle Holocene. It is in this sandy deposit scattered with pebbles that quartzite flakes, cores and tools are found; Ameghino (1934 ) assigned those remains to an exaggerated old tertiary age. Nowadays, we know it was a workshop where the fluvial pebbles of the Early Holocene mentioned above were used. Since the raw material was of medium quality for flaking, the Pampean hunter–gatherers invested little work on their manufacture (Bayón and Zavala 1997). The artifacts resemble rather crude-looking tools, and some of them are simply poorly flaked cores. This slight modification and its crudeness made Ameghino consider them to be “primitive” technology. On top of this sequence, the littoral dunes were set up, circa 7,000 years before present (BP), fixed today by vegetation typical of this landscape.
The Second Scenario: Playa Del Barco
This faunal association contains members of the native fauna of either South and North America, composing a mixture post-Great American Biotic Interchange taxa. Representative species of the native fauna include some of the groups which were present at FMH but appearing as different, more modern genera: among the Xenarthra, the Dasypodidade with the genus Eutatus, and the Glyptodontidae with Glyptodon, Doedicurus, Panochthus, and others; the giant ground sloths with members of two families, Mylodontidae (Mylodon, Scelidotherium, Glossotherium) and Megatheridae (Megatherium). The endemic ungulates decreased notably in biodiversity and are only represented by one genus of the Notoungulata (Toxodon) and one of the Litopterna (Macrauchenia). The mammals of North American origin include Cervidae (Morenelaphus), Camelidae (Lama and Paleolama), Equidae, Proboscidea (Stegomastodon), and Carnivora (Smilodon; Aramayo and Manera de Bianco 1989). The studies carried out on this faunal group show that it was affected by taphonomic processes. The most remarkable process was the transportation of bones by a dense medium (debris flow), which affected the integrity of the group and produced a mixture of remains of different chronology and environments (Tomassini et al. 2010).
The Third Scenario: Pehuen Co Palaeoichnological Site
Up to the present, there is only one 14,000 BP dating, based on organic matter recovered in the middle levels of the sedimentary sequence that contains the footprints of the Pleistocene fauna. This dating produced an age of 12.000 ± 110 years BP, in coincidence with the chronologic estimations made as a result of the stratigraphic position of the faunistic group (Aramayo and de Manera Bianco 1996). Nevertheless, this age is still tentative due to the nature and uniqueness of the sample.
The evidence found in Pehuen Co allows us to consider two aspects. One of them is related to the activities people were carrying out in the site, the other is connected to the relation between this site and other South American sites assigned to the latest Pleistocene. First, both the trackway and the loose footprints on isolated pieces show the transit of adult individuals, possibly in small groups, on the shores of freshwater bodies visited regularly by large mammals. This scenario would be compatible with hunting events, in which the few hunters, usually men, scout around places where there are better chances of finding prey.
Second, these human traces are chronologically related to older evidence of the first settlers of the Pampean region of the Buenos Aires province. The archeological evidence of human presence of about 12.000 14C years BP are few and weak, not only in the region but in all America. The human sign of continuous occupation of the continent appears only at circa 12,500 years BP in the Monte Verde site in Chile (Dillehay 1997) and in Brazil (the recent dating of a human tooth in Toca Do Gordo do Garrincho that gave an age of 12.210 ± 40; Peyre et al. 2009). In the Pampean region, there is a human signal, still feeble, at Arroyo Seco Site (130 kilometers northeast from Pehuen Co). At this site, some Pleistocene mammals were dated. Megatherium bones had marks of human action and were associated with stone tools, at circa 12,150 years BP (Steele and Politis 2009; Politis et al. in press, 2011). Another dating of Toxodon bone was estimated at 11,750 14C years BP, although in this case no human action was verified. Finally, a third event was dated at 14C years BP, which involves two equids present in the Pampean Latest Pleistocene: Equus and Hippidion. This event also exhibits evidence of human agency. It is important to highlight that the fauna of Arroyo Seco 2 dated between 12.150 and 11.200 BP also includes other genera, such as Glossoteherium and Paleolama; all are represented in the Pehuen Co ichnites, thus suggesting that both sites show similar faunal composition but in different kind of records.
In the Pampean region, 16 sites dated during the Pleistocene–Holocene transition have been excavated in different settings. Pehuen Co human footprints would be included in this group. Ten of these sites are in caves, rock shelters, or open-air sites in the Tandilia hill range (Flegenheimer 2003; Mazzanti 2003; Mazzanti et al. 2010). The other six are located on plains near ponds or rivers (Flegenheimer et al. 2010; Martínez 2006; Politis and Messineo 2008). Probably both the sites in the Tandilia hill ranges and those in the surrounding plains are related. The majority of the occupations (12 sites) have a chronology between 11.000 and 9.000 14C years BP (Fig. 1). Although each site presents specific characteristics, the early hunter–gatherers share technological decisions as well as the good quality raw material selection strategies (Flegenheimer 2003). At some six of the sites, particular projectile points called “fishtail points” were found. This point is also present in other places in South America, also dated at the end of the Pleistocene (Flegenheimer et al. 2003; Nami 2007).
The settlements in the plains are characterized by being open-air sites and by the presence of Pleistocene mega-mammals remains. For example, in Arroyo Seco 2 (Fig. 1) giant ground sloths and extinct horses were processed and consumed, while in Paso Otero 5 (Fig. 1) the hunter–gatherers took advantage of Hemiauchenia and Megatherium and might even have used the bones as fuel (Martínez 2006). On the other hand, Pehuen Co site is indicative of the wandering of one or many hunters around a place with a variety of Pleistocene fauna. The presence of these large animals, represented either by their bones or footprints, suggests some kind of cooperative hunting strategy. It probably implies that there was an important number of individuals nearby who would be the potential consumers, either the hunters’ families or the rest of the band (Politis 2008).
At the end of the Pleistocene, there was a particularly important event: the massive extinction of most of the mega-mammals whose footprints are found at Pehuen Co. The archeological and paleontological evidence of the region indicates that until circa 10,000 years BP, the Pampean grasslands supported an enormous biomass of large herbivores, which disappeared in a few thousand years. During the Late Pleistocene, 80% of mammals heavier than 44 kg and 100% of those heavier than 1000 kg were extinct (Owen-Smith 1987). Nevertheless, Pleistocene faunal remains (Megatherium and Doedicurus) whose radiocarbon dates indicate surprisingly recent ages were found in the Pampean plains in the La Moderna and Campo Laborde sites. These ages ranged between 7,500 and 8,000 14C years BP. Both sites (Fig. 1) have been interpreted as hunting/scavenging and primary butchering sites of very late mega-mammals on the shores of old swamps (Politis and Messineo 2008). These animals survived in the Pampean region for a few millennia within the Holocene (Gutiérrez and Martínez 2007; Politis and Messineo 2008).
What brought about the fast disappearance of the large and medium-sized mammal community? This topic has been extensively debated by different authors, and the answers vary from models that give human beings a central role in overkilling during the early stages of settlement (Cione et al. 2003; Martin 1984) to others who argue that the climatic and environmental changes were the main cause of the extinction (see summary in Haynes 2009). Some intermediate models propose either a minor role for human beings in the South American Pleistocene fauna extinction since the killing of these animals would have been occasional and opportunistic (Borrero 2009), or that the hunting would only have intensively affected the immigrant genera such as Equus and Hippidion and the Gomphoteridae Family (Politis et al. 1995). However, the evidence at Pehuen Co indicates that when the first human beings arrived in the Pampean region, most of the large- and medium-sized mammals were still alive. The evidence is too weak at this site to clarify the impact of these human beings on the Pampean animal community.
The Fourth Scenario: Monte Hermoso 1–La Olla (1, 2, 4)
At the beginning of the Middle Holocene, between 8,000 and 6,000 years BP, a new climatic change transformed the environment of the Pampean southwest. The cold and dry conditions, predominant during most of the final Pleistocene gave way to more moderate and mild conditions with more stability, characteristic of the beginning of the Holocene (Quattrocchio et al. 2008). Meanwhile, the sea level rose and the coast got closer to its present position (Fig. 2).
The archeological sites of Monte Hermoso 1 (MH1)–La Olla (with three discrete sectors LO 1, 2, and 4) are located on the Atlantic coast, 15 kilometers east of Pehuen Co palaeoichnological site, near the town of Monte Hermoso. It extends 1,200 meters along the beach and is composed of stratigraphic deposits of overlaying levels of clay and sand formed in shallow water bodies with a certain degree of marine influence. The deposits present a variety of evidence of human occupation of the coast. The archeological site La Olla shows abundant faunal remains, as well as artifacts made on stone, bone and wood. On the other hand, in MH1, the archeological record is formed by numerous human, mammal, and bird footprints.
MH1 was located near an extinct lagoon between the dunes near the ocean surrounded by the typical humid interdune vegetation with slight marine influence (Zavala et al. 1992). The ostracode species are characteristic of environments of continental brackish water (Quattrocchio et al. 2008). On the other hand, the site LO1-2-4 is in a coastal marsh (Blasi MS 2010), with a predominantly halophyte vegetation. The ostracode species are typical of marine waters (Fontana 2005; Martínez et al. 2010; Quattrocchio et al. 2008). The vertebrate species present in these sites are those typical of the continental and marine Holocene fauna of the Pampean Region. There are 18 AMS radiocarbon dates from the site and two conventional ones which indicate that the marsh lasted between 7,920 and 6,600 years 14C BP. Some of the dates come from marine mammals which have some reservoir effect not calculated yet.
Monte Hermoso 1
Both Monte Hermoso and the 1-La Olla site form a unique record in America, which also illustrates exceptionally the hunter–gatherers’ way of life when the Atlantic coast drew closer, in the Pampean region between circa 7,600 and 6,600 14C years ago. On the coast of Monte Hermoso, the first signs of exploitation of marine resources were established. Also, these sites would be part of a nomadic circuit between the coast and the inland, which started at least in the Early Holocene and probably lasted until the very Late Holocene (Bonomo 2005).
On the southwest edge of the Pampean region, four important moments in the evolution of the landscape, of the animal communities and of the human settlements of South America are exceptionally represented. Farola Monte Hermoso cliff clearly shows continental sediments containing remains of Miocene–Pliocene mammals, members of the native fauna that inhabited Southamerica before The Great American Biotic Interchange. This mammal association is very important and served as the basis to define an evolutionary stage named Monthermosean Stage/Age. This cliff also has a great historic and heritage value: Darwin extracted the fossils there that made an early impact on his “transmutationist” ideas, and in front of them Florentino Ameghino and Ales Hdrlička hotly debated on the age of the “American Man.”
At the Playa del Barco site, there is a faunal association composed of both South American native fauna and North American immigrants. The native fauna is represented by some groups that were present at the Farola Monte Hermoso site but with different and more modern genera. This environment was still not altered by human beings, and it would represent the scene that the first hunter–gatherers faced when they arrived in the region.
A turning point in the history of life in South America is represented in Pehuen Co: probably the last megamammal footprints are here together with those of the first human beings who populated the region. The end of the Pleistocene (circa 12,000 years BP) was a crucial moment beyond which the Pampean region physiognomy changed: a few thousand years later, none of these megamammals whose footprints filled Pehuen Co remained, and the plains were covered with hunter–gatherer bands that intensively exploited much smaller animals, such as the guanaco and the pampas deer.
During the Early Holocene, between circa 7,000 and 6,500 14C year BP, almost immediately after the last giant ground sloths and glyptodonts were extinct, the hunter–gatherers began to exploit intensively the coastal resources, especially the sea mammals, and they left hundreds of their footprints at water bodies near the beach. This exceptional record is complemented with the finding of wooden instruments, a type of technology previously unknown in the Pampean archeological record. All these considerations make this part of the Pampean region an extraordinary place to understand the evolutionary processes in South America within a wide scale. Also, it presents a unique record which allows us to have a clearer view of these key four moments in the environmental evolution of the continent.
- Ameghino F. Monte Hermoso. Buenos Aires: Imprenta de Pablo Coni e Hijos; 1887.Google Scholar
- Ameghino F. La Industria de la Piedra Quebrada de Monte Hermoso. Obras Completas y correspondencia científica de Florentino Ameghino. Vol. XVIII. La Plata: Taller de Impresiones Oficiales; 1934 . p. 391–7.Google Scholar
- Aramayo SA, de Manera Bianco T. Edad y nuevos hallazgos de icnitas de mamíferos y aves en el yacimiento paleoicnológico de Pehuen Co (Pleistoceno tardío). Publicación Especial 4 1 Reunión Argentina de Icnología: Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina Asociación Paleontológica Argentina; 1996. p. 47–57.Google Scholar
- Aramayo SA, de Manera Bianco T. Primer hallazgo de icnitas de mamíferos pleistocenos en “Playa del Barco”, Pehuen Co, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Ameghiniana. Suplemento Resúmenes. 2000;37(4):19.Google Scholar
- Aramayo SA, Manera de Bianco T. Nuevos hallazgos de mamíferos pleistocénicos en el Yacimiento de Playa del Barco, Provincia de Buenos Aires. Actas, Primeras Jornadas Geológicas Bonaerenses (1985 )Tandil: 1989;701–12.
- Bayón C, Politis G. Estado actual de las investigaciones en el Sitio Monte Hermoso 1 (Prov. de Buenos Aires). Arqueología. 1996;6:83–115.Google Scholar
- Bayón C, Zavala C. Coastal sites in south Buenos Aires: A review of Piedras Quebradas. Quaternary of South America and Antartic Peninsula. In: Rabassa J, Salemme M, editors. Vol 10: 229–253. A. A. Bookfield: BalkemaL Rotterdam; 1997.
- Blasi A. MS, Informe geológico del sitio La Olla. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. UNLP. La Plata. 2010
- Bonomo M. Archaeology and human interaction between coastal and inland settings: the Pampean Atlantic coast, Argentina. Before Farming 2005(3), article 3. 2005.
- Borrero L. The elusive evidence: the archeological record of the South American extinct megafauna. In: Haynes G, editor. American megafaunal extinctions at the end of the Pleistocene. New York: Springer Science; 2009. p. 145–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cione AL, Tonni EP, Soibelenzon L. The broken zig-zag: Late Cenozoic large mammals and tortoises extinction in South America. RevArg del Mus de Cs Nat ns. 2003;5(1):2–19.Google Scholar
- Dillehay TD. Monte Verde: a Late Pleistocene settlement in Chile. The archaeological context and interpretation, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1997.Google Scholar
- Eldredge N. Darwin lives! A World of Science. 2009;7(4):2–9.Google Scholar
- Flegenheimer N. Cerro el Sombrero: a locality with a view. Ancient Evidence for Paleo South Americans: from where the south winds blow. In: Miotti L, Salemme M, Flegenheimer N (editors) Editor in Chief: R. Bonnichsen. Center for the Study of the First Americans. Texas: Texas University Press; 2003. pp. 51–6.
- Flegenheimer N, Bayón C, Valente M, Baeza J, Femeninas J. Long distance tool stone transport in the Argentine Pampas. Quaternary International, guest editors L. Miotti and M. Salemme. The Journal of the INQUA. 2003;109–110:49–64.Google Scholar
- Flegenheimer N, Bayón C, Pupio A. LLegar a un nuevo mundo. Arqueología de los primeros pobladores del actual territorio argentino, Ed. Antropofagia, Buenos Aires, 2ª ed. 2007.
- Flegenheimer N, Bayón C, Scabuzzo C, Mazzia N, Vecchi R, Weitzel C, Frontini R, Colombo M. Early Holocene human skeletal remains from the Argentinean Pampas. Current Research in the Pleistocene 2010;27:10–12.Google Scholar
- Fontana S. Holocene vegetation history and palaeoenvironmental conditions on the temperate Atlantic coast of Argentina, as inferred from multi-proxy lacustrine records. J Paleolimnol. 2005;34:445–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gutiérrez MA, Martínez GA. Trends in the faunal human exploitation during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene in the Pampean region (Argentina). Quatern Int. 2007;191:53–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haynes G, editor. American megafaunal extinctions at the end of the Pleistocene. New York: Springer; 2009.Google Scholar
- Johnson E, Politis G, Gutierrez M. Early Holocene bone technology at the Coastal La Olla 1 site along the Pampas seashore of Argentina. J Archaeol Sci. 2000;27:463–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manera de Bianco T, Aramayo SA, Zavala C, Caputo R. Yacimiento Paleoicnológico de Pehuen Co. Un patrimonio natural en peligro. Sitios de Interés Geológico, Comisión Sitios de Interés Geológico de la República Argentina, Instituto de Geología y Recursos Minerales, Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino (Eds). Buenos Aires: Artes Gráficas Papiros; 2008. pp. 509–20.
- Marshall LG, Hoffstetter R, Pascual R. Mammals and stratigraphy: Geochronology of the continental mammal-bearing Tertiary of South America. Palaeovertebrata, Montpellier. Mem Extr 1983;1–93.
- Martin P. Prehistoric overkill: the global model. Quaternary extinctions: a prehistoric revolution. In: Martin PS, Klein RG (editors) University of Arizona Press; 1984. pp. 354–403.
- Martínez G. Arqueología del curso medio del río Quequén Grande: Estado actual y aportes a la arqueología de la Región Pampeana. Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Antropología 2006;XXXI:249–75.
- Martínez D, Jiménez L, Bayón C, Politis G. Sitios arqueológicos del Holoceno de la costa sur de la provincia de Buenos Aires: los ostracódos como indicadores paleoecológicos Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía y VII Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontología. Argentina: La Plata; 2010.Google Scholar
- Mazzanti DL. Human settlements in caves and rockshelter during the Pleistocene–Holocene in the Eastern of Tandilia Range, Pampean Region, Argentina. Ancient evidence for Paleo South Americans: from where the South Winds blow. In: Miotti L, Salemme M, Flegenheimer N (editors) Editor in Chief: R. Bonnichsen. Center for the Study of the First Americans. Texas: Texas University Press; 2003. pp. 57–61.
- Mazzanti D, Colobig M, Zucol FA, Martínez G, Porto López J, Brea M, et al. Investigaciones arqueológicas em el sitio 1 de la localidad Lobería 1. Mamül Mapu pasado y presente desde la arqueología Pampeana. In: Berón M, Luna L, Bonomo M, Montalvo C, Aranda C, Carrera Aizpitarte y M (editors) Editorial Libros del Espinillo, Ayacucho; 2010. pp. 99–114.
- Nami H. Research in the Middle Rio Negro Basin (Uruguay) and the Paleoindian Occupation of the Southern Cone. Curr Anthropol. 2007;48(1):164–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Owen-Smith RN. Pleistocene extinctions: the pivotal role of megaherbivores. Paleobiology. 1987;13:351–62.Google Scholar
- Peyre A, Granat J, Guidon N. Dents et cranes humains fossiles du Garrincho (Brasil) et peuplements anciens de l'Amerique. Actes Societe francaise d'histoire de l'art dentaire. 2009;14:32–7.Google Scholar
- Politis G. The Pampas and Campos of South America. In: Silverman H, Isbell W (editors) Handbook of South American Archaeology. New York: Springer; 2008. pp. 235–60.
- Politis GG, Gutierrez M, Scabuzzo C (editors). Estado actual de las investigaciones arqueológicas en el sitio Arroyo Seco 2 (Pdo. de Tres Arroyos, Pcia. de Buenos Aires, Argentina). Serie Monográfica INCUAPA nro 4. Olavarría 2011, In press.
- Politis GG, Messineo PG. The Campo Laborde site: new evidence for the Holocene survival of Pleistocene megafauna in the Argentine pampas. Quatern Int. 2008;191:98–114.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Politis G, Prado JL, Beukens R. The Human Impact in Pleistocene–Holocene extinctions in South America—The Pampean Case. In: Johnson E, editor. Ancient Peoples and Landscapes. Museum of Texas Tech University: Lubbock, Texas; 1995.Google Scholar
- Politis G, Scabuzzo C, Tykot R. An approach to prehispanic diets in the pampas during early/middle Holocene. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2009;19:266–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pupio A, Bayón C, Vecchi R. Buscando las pruebas para el Darwinismo. F. Ameghino en Monte Hermoso. “Workshop Bridging the Gap…Darwin from molecule to cultural implications”. 10–12 de Octubre Bahía Blanca. 2009.
- Quattrocchio M, Borromei AM, Deschamps CM, Grill SC, Zavala CA. Landscape evolution and climate changes in the Late Pleistocene–Holocene, southern Pampa (Argentina): evidence from palynology, mammals and sedimentology. Quatern Int. 2008;181:123–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Quattrocchio M, Deschamps CM, Zavala CA, Grill SC, Borromei AM. Geology of the area of Bahía Blanca, Darwin's view and the present knowledge: a story of 10 million years. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina. 2009;64(1):137–46.Google Scholar
- Simpson GG. History of the fauna of Latin America. Am Sci. 1950;38:361–89.Google Scholar
- Steele J, Politis G. AMS 14C dating of early human occupation of southern South America. J Archaeol Sci. 2009;36:419–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tomassini RL, Montalvo CI, Manera T, Oliva C. Estudio tafonómico de los mamíferos pleistocenos del yacimiento Playa del Barco (Pehuen Co), provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Ameghiniana. 2010;47(2):137–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zavala C. Estratigrafía de la localidad de Farola Monte Hermoso (Plioceno–Reciente), provincia de Buenos Aires. Actas 12º Congreso Geológico Argentino y 2ª Congreso de Exploración de Hidrocarburos 1993;2:228–35.Google Scholar
- Zavala C, Quattrocchio M. Estratigrafía y evolución geológica del río Sauce Grande (Cuaternario), provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Asociación Geológica Argentina, Revista. 2001;56(1):25–37.Google Scholar
- Zavala C, Grill S, Martínez D, Ortiz H, González R. Análisis paleoambiental de depósitos cuaternarios. Sitio Paleoicnológico Monte Hermoso I, Provincia de Buenos Aires. Actas de las Terceras Jornadas Geológicas Bonaerenses: 31–37. La Plata. 1992.
- Zavala C, García L, Di Meglio M. Redes de drenaje y paleoclimas en el Cuaternario del sur de la provincia de Buenos Aires. XVI Congreso Geológico Argentino, CD-ROM, 2005; paper Nº 156. 2 pp. La Plata. 2005.